If the government can overreact, so can I! It’s time to clean house and make sure there are no toys, books, clothing or anything else that might contain lead or phthalates. Nothing in my home has been tested; how do I know my children are safe?
The only solution is to start cleaning it all out. After all, it could be toxic and it’s for the children’s safety!
Time to Clean House, CPSIA Style!
Let’s start with the things we have for my soon to be here baby. May as well get her off to a healthy start. Goodness knows my other kids are probably contaminated already.
Handmedown clothes. Well, so much for those. I have no idea what’s in them.
Come to think of it, her few new outfits and cloth diapers haven’t been certified so far as I know. Oh well. Do I really want to use disposables? I guess we’ll have to try elimination communication with baby.
Oh crap, the potty hasn’t been tested. This is going to take some work.
Toys. Oh my. Toys. Let’s see… handmedown, handmedown, handmedown, new but has it been tested? Really can’t tell yet.
Crib, cradle, what about my rocking chair? I’ve used them all for each of my kids. Then there’s the stroller and car seat. Not to mention my other kids’ beds. Is there any place safe for them to sleep? Can we even go anywhere safely if I don’t know what the car seats are made of?
Awww! Books! I like my supply of baby books! But how can I know if they’re safe? Even libraries are worried. Not to mention my books for my older kids.
OMG! The older kids! Can I even send them to school? Will the schools do enough testing to keep my kids safe? They have books there too!
Guess we’ll just have to start all over with all the kids’ stuff.
Maybe that’s the idea! Stimulate the economy by making people buy all new stuff to protect their kids! Too bad lots of manufacturers will go under because they can’t keep up with expenses. The price of safety, right? Surely we can cope with the scarcity created and cost of extra testing by paying more.
And don’t worry about the landfills. Or do. There’s an awful lot to be thrown out if companies don’t want to or can’t afford to test their products.
I wonder what it would cost to test the house. Can’t be too careful, after all.
Ending on a Serious Note
Ooh, sounds important, doesn’t it?
But seriously, read up on CPSIA directly from the CPSC site if you’re concerned. It’s confusing at times, boring as can be to read, but a much better source for information than any secondhand, unofficial interpretation. It’s still miserably written, and no doubt will have a major impact on small and home businesses that produce children’s products, but keep an eye out for good bits such as:
Will infantsâ€™ crib bedding, blankets, bath textiles, and apparel fall under the heading of â€œdurable productâ€?
No. Congress did not define the term â€œdurable,â€ but it is commonly understood to mean able to exist for a long time without significant deterioration. Cloth/textile items are generally not considered to be durable goods. None of the items Congress specified in section 104 as examples of durable products are items made entirely of cloth, rather they are primarily made from rigid materials (e.g., cribs, toddler beds, high chairs, strollers, bath seats).
Do the phthalate limits apply to childrenâ€™s shoes or socks?
Shoes and socks are not considered to be childrenâ€™s toys or child care articles.
All that said, I really think the targeting should have been more focused. The problem products have not generally come from small or home based businesses; for lead the problem has often been Chinese imports. A better look at the standards of where we are getting children’s products from, and rules about what we will accept would make more sense than CPSIA. Not to mention a better time frame for things companies haven’t had to test for before.